<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<TEI xmlns='http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0'>
	<teiHeader>
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt>
				<title type='main'>craftsB06f002i001</title>
			</titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher>tranScriptorium</publisher>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<bibl><publisher>TRP document creator: chris.burns@uvm.edu</publisher></bibl>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text>
		<body>
			<pb n='1'/>
			<p>
				<lg>
					<l>Washington, June 11 1842</l>
					<l>My dear friends,</l>
					<l>I have receieved a letter from W E Paddock, dated</l>
					<l>June 3d in which he says that you were well.  I have for a</l>
					<l>day or two past been looking for another letter from you,</l>
					<l>your last being dated, May 25.  I should be glad to hear from</l>
					<l>you, at least, once a week, I must depend chiefly on you</l>
					<l>for an account of what takes place at Craftsbury, as I do not</l>
					<l>expect any others to write, unless occasionally, and upon business.</l>
					<l>I remain perfectly well, am regular in my living and ex-</l>
					<l>ercise, and hope I shall be able to preserve my health until</l>
					<l>I get back to Craftsbury.  But when that will be, no human</l>
					<l>being can tell.  Congress sits six or seven hours each day, yet</l>
					<l>they make but small progress in dispatching the business be-</l>
					<l>fore then.  The House of Representatives have at legnth commenced</l>
					<l>upon the Tariff.  But there are so many disagreement upon the</l>
					<l>mode, manner, and amount of duties to be [ ], that it will re-</l>
					<l>quire some weeks to mature an act for this purpose; and it is</l>
					<l>yet doubtful whether an act can be got through Congress, that</l>
					<l>will answer the expectations of the people at the North.  It is</l>
					<l>agreed on all hands that the duties on importation must be</l>
					<l>considerably raised for the purpose of revenue; and I believe</l>
					<l>an act especially for that object might be passed without much</l>
					<l>difficulty.  This alone would afford some protection.  But there is a</l>
					<l>S.C. Crafts. June 11 1842.</l>
				</lg>
			</p>
			<pb n='2'/>
			<p>
				<lg>
					<l>large party opposed to making any considerable discrimination</l>
					<l>for the purposes of protection; and I very much doubt whether</l>
					<l>we can get a duty on foreign wool higher than thirty percent</l>
					<l>on the original cost.  The foreign wool that comes in competition</l>
					<l>with ours, I understand costs upon an average about thirty cents</l>
					<l>a pound, and thirty percent will bring it up to near forty unto a</l>
					<l>pound.  The woolen manufacturers pretend that they cannot afford</l>
					<l>to give more, unless the duties on imported cloths are raised above</l>
					<l>40 percent.  I am still in hopes we can get the duty on wool</l>
					<l>raised to 33 1/3 per ct -  There are may [many] who will oppose all dis-</l>
					<l>crimination unless the distribution act is repealed.  The Locos</l>
					<l>are in general opposed to protection, and in favor of a repeal of</l>
					<l>the distribution of the process of the public lands.  You will</l>
					<l>see by the Intelligencer which I send you, that the Senate have</l>
					<l>concurred with the House in districting all the states for the</l>
					<l>choice of Representatives to Congress; they have raised the ratio,</l>
					<l>so that Vermont would be entitled to but 4 Representatives; lest it</l>
					<l>is uncertain whether the House will agree to our amendment.</l>
					<l>The Senate have spent nearly three weeks upon this bill; and that</l>
					<l>section which directs the districting the states have been opposed</l>
					<l>by every Loco in the Senate with all their force and talents,</l>
					<l>and several of them have a good show.  All the States that</l>
					<l>have adopted the general ticket system, are Loco states, and there</l>
					<l>are five or six of them; in each of which if they were districted  </l>
					<l>there would be one or more whigs.</l>
				</lg>
			</p>
			<pb n='3'/>
			<p>
				<lg>
					<l>This part of the letter is for Mary more particularly</l>
					<l>I had written what preceeds this when the bell summonded us</l>
					<l>to tea, and before returning to my chamber, the mail arrived</l>
					<l>with your letter of the 6. from which I am gratified to learn</l>
					<l>that you are in so good helath, and that all things are genera[lly] </l>
					<l>going on so well.  I am sorry that Mrs Clark is so unwell</l>
					<l>William wrote me that she was quite unwell, and that Mary</l>
					<l>was also quite feeble, and if she was improving at all, it was</l>
					<l>very slow.  I am glad to hear that Mrs Corbin was well enough</l>
					<l>to call on you- and that she had received my letter.  I wrote</l>
					<l>also to Mrs Clarks, which I presume she had received long before</l>
					<l>this time.  You ask me to tell you something about the</l>
					<l>fashions.  I never had much tact in noticing fashions so carefully</l>
					<l>as to be able to describe them.  I have however observed that</l>
					<l>the bonetts [bonnets] are precisely in the form of your silk one, made</l>
					<l>by Betsy Elkins.  But they are worn of all colors from black</l>
					<l>to white of silk, as well as many of straw; and the young ladies</l>
					<l>wear artificial flowers in their bonets [bonnets].  Their dresses are shaped</l>
					<l>very much like the dress you had made in Boston; I can hardly</l>
					<l>perceive any difference- This is all I can give you on that</l>
					<l>subject.  And now for flowers.  I have seen in some of the</l>
					<l>gardens great numbers of white lillies [lilies] in bloom.  They are an elegant</l>
					<l>flower.  The common old fashion pinks I saw to day in blossom.</l>
					<l>A great many of the flowers here are such as grow in your</l>
					<l>garden &amp; James!  I cannot recollect the names.  There are many</l>
					<l>however, which are new to me.  The flowers around the pub-</l>
					<l>lic grounds, are annual.  I saw yesterday hollyhocks almost ready</l>
				</lg>
			</p>
			<pb n='4'/>
			<p>
				<lg>
					<l>to blossom. Honeysuckle is in full bloom.  Yesterday I was passing</l>
					<l>a garden I saw a lemon tree full of fruit, apparently full grown.</l>
					<l>it was kept in a green house through the winter.  We frequently</l>
					<l>have cucumbers at our dinners.  I learn however that they were</l>
					<l>raised in hot houses.  Yesterday we had <hi rend='underlined:true;'>pears</hi>, - small but ripe &amp;</l>
					<l>good- but on enquiry I found that they were brought from Nor-</l>
					<l>folk in Virginia.  I believe I gave a description of</l>
					<l>the public grounds about the Capital &amp; Presidents house, in my</l>
					<l>letter to Mrs Clark- which I presume you have seen before</l>
					<l>this.  Genl Walton has sent me the Watchman regularly, and</l>
					<l>after reading them I have enclosed them to Arba Nelson.  I</l>
					<l>will as you recommend enclose something to Caleb Hill; I should</l>
					<l>have done it before, had I known where to direct it, which</l>
					<l>I learn from your letter.  I am sorry to hear that your spring</l>
					<l>is so backward.  I expected it for it has been very chilly here; and</l>
					<l>if March and April had not been uncommonly warm here, vegetation</l>
					<l>would have been backward here also.</l>
					<l>Give my love to Mr &amp; Mrs Corbin when you see them; to</l>
					<l>Mrs Clark, and all our cousins. and accept my most fervant</l>
					<l>prayers for your health and happiness.</l>
					<l>Saml C Crafts</l>
					<l>If you get the Intelligencer regularly you will get a pretty full account</l>
					<l>of the proceedings of Congress- I have sent you Mr Choates speech in the</l>
					<l>Senate.  His both able and brilliant.</l>
					<l>Please present my respect to Mr &amp; Mrs Hall-</l>
					<l>I have looked over this letter, it is [ ] concern!</l>
				</lg>
			</p>
		</body>
	</text>
</TEI>
