Skip to content
Home
Collections
Browse
About
Contact Us
Login
Basic
Advanced
Search full text
Search
Note: Put the word between quotation marks (“example”) to perform an exact search.
Field
Title
Creator
Collection
Description
Subject
Condition
Must
Must not
Should
Type of search
Contain
Equal
Multi values
Regex
Range
Starts with
Ends with
Value
Value
Value
Value
Add more criteria
Clear
Search
Previous
Back
Next
Home
>
Collections
>
Women's Suffrage in Vermont Collection
Annette W. Parmelee to Marion R. Horton
Your browser does not support iframes.
Information
Parent Collections
Women's Suffrage in Vermont Collection
Title
Annette W. Parmelee to Marion R. Horton
Author
Parmelee, Annette Watson, 1865-1924.
Recipient
Horton, Marion R.
Date Created
1919-09-11
Description
Parmelee debates whether or not to accept the position of State Historian for the Vermont Equal Suffrage Association, and gives her opinion as to Governor Clement's opposition to women's suffrage.
Subject
Women -- Suffrage -- Vermont.
Women -- Suffrage -- United States.
Women's rights -- Vermont.
Women's rights -- United States.
Extent
1 page
Note [Digital Version]
2020-05-05, Center for Digital Initiatives, University of Vermont Libraries
Genre
correspondence
Type of Resource
text
Source Document Location
Vermont Historical Society Library, Barre, Vermont
Shelf Location
Vermont Equal Suffrage Association Papers, 1883-1927 (MSC 144:24)
Publisher
University of Vermont Libraries, Center for Digital Initiatives
Date Captured
2020-05-05
Access Conditions
No Known Copyright
Access Conditions [Local]
Requests to reproduce this item should be sent to Vermont Historical Society Library, library@vermonthistory.org.
Identifier [Local]
VESA_1919_09_11_Parmelee_02
Language
English
Language [Code]
eng
Digital Format
image/tiff
Digital Format
Text/Color: 24 bits; 300 ppi
Download
Loading...
Current image, full-size
Current image, reduced-size
Other download options:
Other download options
×
Current document
Format
JPG
Max. 10 page(s)
PDF
Pages
All
Range
The defined range is higher than allowed